WINDOWS 3.1 IN BROWSER FREE
I tried quite a lot of web operating systems at the time - mostly to see just what they could do within the browser - but, frankly, couldn't find much of a practical use for them except to mirror my static websites on the free webhosting with high disk quotas that many generously provided. It was pretty hot around the mid-noughties, or at least that's the impression I got, but peaked in 2007-2008 without having produced a killer app (tellingly, nowadays Google Docs and the like still don't offer you a "desktop"). This reminds me of the whole "web operating system" or "web desktop" trend. (shows the basic UI but doesn't let you start any applications). But I just wanted to make the point that some people found menu bats easier to use because, for them, menu bars just were simpler to use rather than them hating something just because it's newerĪ somewhat working mirror.
WINDOWS 3.1 IN BROWSER WINDOWS
Thankfully these days theres other decent alternatives to Windows and the importance of the desktop OS is also lessoned with the rise of cross platform browsers and web apps, so it's easy for me to run another OS instead of trapping myself on a platform I dislike and growing bitter about it. The only reason behind that is aesthetics so I really resent having to press alt just to display it (I know you can enable it permanently but I get given a lot if laptops to repair due to being the family's "pc fixer").
I also dislike the way how the menu bar is hidden in explorer. Where as the old menu system might have been ugly and verbose, but I could follow it's logic easier when trying to perform uncommon tasks.
The mixture of icon sizes, placements and behaviors (Eg drop down menus, toggles or buttons) leaves me guessing a lot of the time. Personally I honestly find the ribbon bar is more confusing. You need to remember that your usage doesn't mean others are identical. The world isn't going to improve if we optimize for older generations of people who are used to a certain way of doing things and dislike change. Realistically speaking though it didn't actually take him 7 years. I think even my dad at this point has learned to be as efficient with the ribbon as he was in the old world. I for one make better documents with the ribbon. Conversely, imagine if Office has always had the ribbon and then they switched to the toolbar menu UI.ĭo you honestly think people would like it better? The obvious answer is that, no, of course they wouldn't because the ribbon UI is actually a better UI as it improves discoverability of features (and Office has hundreds if not thousands of features). Find any favorites on there? Fire up your dial-up connection and leave a comment, below.> Imagine how much LOVE MS Office would get if it went back to something like the early days of File menus and small-icon tool bars that you could enable/disable, etc? Well, I think it would be a win.Īll you're saying is people hate change. Almost everybody’s computer was packed with strange, homebrew shareware titles during this period, so maybe you’ll recognize a few old, obscure favorites.Īll of The Internet Archive’s Windows 3.1 can be played directly in your browser, although, as in the past, you can’t save any of the games. There are also a lot of weird shareware games – the Windows 3.1 era saw the birth of a little thing called the internet and the concept of downloading and sharing games. That means there are fewer recognizable games in the Windows 3.1 collection than in the MS-DOS one, but there still are a few gems including SimEarth, The Even More Incredible Machine, Castle of the Winds, Out Of This World and more. Of course, given Windows 3.1 is a more recent operating system than MS-DOS, there are fewer Windows 3.1 games in the public domain.
WINDOWS 3.1 IN BROWSER ARCHIVE
Early last year The Internet Archive unleashed a flood of nostalgia when they made a huge collection of MS-DOS games available for free, and now they’re pulling the heart strings of ’90s kids once again with over 1000 Windows 3.1 games.
0 kommentar(er)
